Activision To Sony: Lower The Price Of PS3

It was recently reported that Bobby Kotick—head of one of the largest video game companies: Activision—is a little discouraged with the state of Sony and the Playstation 3.  Kotick says, “I’m getting concerned about Sony; the PlayStation 3 is losing a bit of momentum and they don’t make it easy for me to support the platform. It’s expensive to develop for the console, and the Wii and the Xbox are just selling better. Games generate a better return on invested capital on the Xbox than on the PlayStation.”

Kotick attributes to the PS3’s slow sales to its hefty price.  Right now, the Playstation 3, with an 80 GB hard drive sells for $399.99.  For the same price, you can purchase the Xbox 360 “Elite Bundle” which includes a 120 GB hard drive, Halo 3, Fable 2, a headset, and an Ethernet and HDMI cable.  That’s quite the difference.  Mr. Kotick also states that “[t]hey have to cut the price, because if they don’t, the attach rates [the number of games each console owner buys] are likely to slow.”  And he is right.  There isn’t much to entice a consumer to pay more for a console and get less.  In fact, the only thing that the Playstation 3 has going for it is its inclusion of a Blu Ray player.

Mr. Kotick closed his comments saying, “[Looking] at 2010 and 2011, we might want to consider if we support the console.”  Losing Activision would be a major blow to the already struggling Playstation 3 market.  With games such as Guitar Hero, Call of Duty, Quake, Tony Hawk, Doom, and others as part of their repertoire, Activision really isn’t a game provider that Sony can afford to lose.

Virtual Reality: helping businesses stay profitable

Sony seriously needs to consider a price rearrangement for its console or it could be losing more than just market share in the near future.  They simply cannot survive on a Blu Ray player and free online gaming.  They’ve been trying that for years—since the launch of the PS3—and sales show that it just doesn’t cut it.

Do you have a PS3?  Have you been wanting to purchase one but can’t get over the cost?  Are the games provided by Activision an important factor to you?  Leave us a comment and tell us what you think.

  • No, I don't have a PS3 and personally I wouldn't get one as I prefer PC games over Console games. But it would probably be a good move if they lowered the price of the PS3. I know a couple of people that would buy it if it was cheaper.


  • I do have a ps3 and I love it, in my opinion its worth every penny that I spent on it. And there is a lot more of a difference between the XBOX 360 Elite Bundle and the 80BG PS3. As you have said the PS3 has a Blu Ray player, but the PS3 also has built in wireless (you need to spend 100 bucks on a wireless adapter for the XBox 360). As well with the 360 you have to pay to play online, now it may not seem like much 49.99US a year but it all adds up after a while. You don't have to pay a cent to play online with the PS3. The PS3 also comes with a Ethernet cable but doesn't include a headset or an HDMI cable. I do agree that Sony could work on creating better bundles for the PS3 but I see no reason that they should cut their prices dramatically if even at all.

  • If ps3 loses CoD everything will go down hill,in order for them to keep CoD they must give up on Halo and L4D.They must forget of Gears,Halo,L4D,Mass Efect(dont know how 2 spell it).If ps3 loses CoD Xbox will be the top consle(i sux at spelling :{ ……

  • Yes I do own a Ps3 and if activision dropped sony there would be almost no reason to have it anymore. Call of Duty is one of my favorite games and it would really suck if there was no more cod on Ps3. ACTIVISION PLEASE DO NOT I REPEAT DO NOT DROP SONY JUST BECAUSE YOU DONT FEEL LIKE YOU'RE GETTIN ENOUGH MONEY EVEN THOUGH YOUR THE BIGGEST GAME DEVELOPER IMO ON THE MARKET!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • >
    Share This