Google Denies Impending Uber Competition

Yesterday’s news that Google had plans to take it to Uber in the form of a fleet of autonomous taxi-bots seems to have ruffled some feathers at the search giant – so much so that company insiders are starting to offer anonymous comments denying the rumors’ veracity.

A new report out of the Wall Street Journal’s Digits blog cites an insider who claims that Google’s app – which yesterday was said to be a prototype for haling self-driving cabs – has been “blown out of proportion.”

“The person said a Google engineer has been testing an internal app that helps Google employees carpool to work,” the report explains, “and the app isn’t associated with the company’s driverless cars program.”

Meanwhile, Google’s Twitter account replied to Bloomberg’s report with this simple statement:

Even still, despite Google’s veiled denials and report’s mention that Google exec David Drummond may not have been asked by Uber to leave its board of directors, there’s no denying the fact that Uber is looking to jump into autonomous cars with both feet. Uber officially announced its partnership with Carnegie Mellon University and its Robotics Lab yesterday, though it seems that the announcement came after TechCrunch initially reported the partnership.

According to the announcement:

“The partnership will provide a forum for Uber technology leaders to work closely with CMU faculty, staff, and students — both on campus and at the National Robotics Engineering Center (NREC) — to do research and development, primarily in the areas of mapping and vehicle safety and autonomy technology.”

It’s difficult not to see this move as a way to catch up with Google. Moreover, it’s difficult to see Google’s self-driving car as anything but the first steps in building a taxi service. How else would a fleet of autonomous vehicles even work? Would people simply buy one and keep it charged in the garage? It makes much more sense from just about every standpoint for Google to own the fleet and offer them when they’re needed. That would remove sticky questions of personal liability for each person using one, and would give Google ultimate control over the cars themselves, further mitigating the chance of hijacking or hacking.

3 ways to cut business costs without layoffs

We’ll see how all this shakes out over the next few weeks, months, and probably even years. No matter what, though, my money’s still on Google.

[Sources: WSJ Digits, Uber]

About the author

— Brian P. Rubin

Brian's been a writer-for-hire for the better part of ten years, creating content for Geek Magazine, Machinima, and even Hasbro's Trivial Pursuit. After living in New York for most of his life, he recently relocated to Minneapolis, Minnesota, where he plays drums in his band, the Lost Wheels, and roams the land for the midwest's best approximation of actual pizza.

Product recommendations

You may like

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.